CT to stop pheasant hunting?
After convincing the Legislature in 2010 that a 100% license fee increase would severely impact license/tag/permit sales/recruitment reducing revenue to both the state and DEP, we are now faced with presenting similar arguments. Someone, OPM (Office of Policy and Management), the Governor's Office, or budgetary officials clearly don't understand the funding, economic impact, and detrimental effect on licensing/recruitment of this proposal. In the opinion of many, the Elimination of the Pheasant Program action is a uninformed budgetary rip-off that benefits neither the state or its citizens.
The Pheasant Stocking Program is Sportsmen funded and is self sustaining - NOTHING comes from the General Fund. Elimination of the program saves the state nothing and in the future reduces revenue to DEEP through reduced license sales, and to the state in terms of economic impact. The methodology is to count revenue generated from Pheasant Stamps ($28) and Small Game licenses ($19/$11 Junior) from those who purchased the stamps to get a total revenue. This number then determines the number of Pheasants that will be stocked in the following year. The $160,000 to be cut is the revenue generated last year and constitutes the stocking program for 2012.
Pheasant Hunting is a Gateway Activity for new hunters. Youngsters and some adults (particularly women) who have completed the mandatory Hunter Safety Course and purchased their Small Game License (mandatory for All hunting) look for a hunting activity. Hunting on state Pheasant Program stocked lands is the least expensive and a traditional family activity for new hunters. Other species available in the past have been Rabbits, Grouse, and Woodcock, but are no longer due to state lack of funding for habitat management. The Pheasant Program is THE new hunter entry vehicle and is used as such in DEEP Junior Hunting Training Day to increase hunting participation.
The economic impact of eliminating Pheasant Hunting is substantial. All Resident hunters averaged 12.2 trips and nonresidents 3.0 trips in Connecticut. Pheasant hunters number 4000-5000. Based on 2010 hunting licensees, resident hunters undertook 770.0 thousand trips and nonresident hunters 9.8 thousand. Total Hunting expenditures in Connecticut are impressive at $109.3 million in 2010 dollars. http://www.ct.gov/dep/lib/dep/outdoor_recreation/2011economicimpactstudy.pdf Table 3.2.3. Using a few of the most common costs (in 1,000s $): Food and Lodging 2,801.5; Hunting Equipment 29,266.3; Transportation 5,365.5, with approximately 60,000 hunters in the state and dividing the totals by 4-5000, economic loss to retail sales is substantial.
It is imperative you write, call, e-mail your state Senator and Representative and all the members of the Appropriations Committee expressing your position. E-mail addresses for the complete Appropriations Committee can be found at http://www.ctsportsmen.com Under "Legislation". To find your legislators with their addresses, tel numbers, etc. go to "How to Find Your Legislators" on the Legislative page. Contact Gov. Malloy "Share Your Opinion" http://www.governor.ct.gov/malloy/cwp/view.asp?a=3998&q=479088 . Contact the Commissioner DEEP Dan Esty (860) 424-3001 and Deputy Commissioner Susan Frechette (860) 424-3005.
You may have noticed that we auction off gear that we have reviewed in 
PA, OH, NY and the NWTF are continuing a 4-year study to estimate the spring gobbler harvest rates in each of the three states. This past winter OH banded 222 birds, PA banded 332, and NY tagged 350. The leg-bands are an aluminum band secured via a stainless steel rivet. Past research has typically used aluminum bands that are squeezed closed, but these bands sometimes fall off. Each leg band is secured to a male turkey's leg, and has a unique letter-number combination. All bands are imprinted with a toll-free telephone number so you can report a harvest or recovery of a band. The study will allow comparisons of harvest and survival rates among the three states, with their varying harvests, hunter numbers and hunter densities. So what’s the deal with hens? Here’s where the CSI twist comes in. Hens caught during the trapping efforts are part of the study. Breast feathers from both males and females are gathered to help build a forensic DNA database. So what’s in it for you other than helping the state and securing the turkey’s future? How about $100. A reward of $100 will be paid for reporting the band to state authorities. The chance of harvesting a bird wearing a $100 band is low, but the information being gathered is significant. So far, $11,300 has been paid to Pennsylvania turkey hunters for reporting bands.
If you think grouse have a problem with bobcats in NY (see 
The 
March 15 is the deadline to apply for the Day-Old Pheasant Chick Program and the Young Pheasant Release Program. The NY State Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) programs should interest any upland hunter who wants to keep the upland hunting tradition alive. The programs do not cost a penny though you will need the proper equipment and you will need to go through the 
It's nice to see a big-box store giving back. 
Ducks Unlimited and the US Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency reached a milestone with the enrollment of the one millionth acre into the popular Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program recently. That reminds me of an old Chinese proverb about a beach is built one grain of sand at a time. That also reminds me I have a great recipe for Peking Duck.
Kentucky farmers can earn extra cash in the Dove Field Hunt Program offered by the 
This coming February 1st through the 15th an experimental Canada goose hunting season will be offered in selected areas. The test is an attempt at controlling the population of geese in and around urban areas around the state. But don’t think you’ll be setting up a blind in a local park. The 
You've read that the turkey hunting is great up north (
MassWildlife’s 
Clucking and cooing may be sweet sounds to us upland hunting purists, but there are other birds worth mentioning—especially this year—the year when the bald eagle was taken off the endangered species list.
Back in 1988, 
This is a little out of Uplandfeathers.com’s range, but really encouraging news. The South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks Department 
In case you didn’t know, 
Over the next 30 days, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Forest Service will hold an online public forum to solicit comments on the proposed annual work plans for Green Ridge, Pocomoke, Potomac-Garrett and Savage River State Forests. You can review and comment on the proposed plans by 
Pheasants Forever (PF) and the National FFA Organization have teamed up on a national level to focus on building student leadership and instill a conservation ethic in young adults. Through a variety of projects and programs, like habitat projects, a local PF chapter hooks up with their local FFA chapter. The new collaboration gives young adults the opportunity to satisfy their interest in conservation and wildlife management specifically in such areas as natural resources, habitat, land stewardship and activities beyond production farming. The collaboration seems like a natural fit.
Ruffed grouse in Minnesota are not to be out drummed by Wisconsin ruffs. You may recall a recent post about the increase in the WI grouse population for a second straight spring. MN ruffs are not to be out done and are at their highest level in seven years, according to the 
As any waterfowl hunter knows, the federal government via the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, produces the yearly 
Ah, bipartisan support for America's wildlife. Sigh. Teddy Roosevelt is shedding a tear of happiness as 162 Representatives and 60 Senators sang Kumbaya and signed a letter urging an increase in funding for the federal State Wildlife Grants, which is the core program for preventing wildlife from becoming endangered in every state. The letter supports funding of $85 million for the State Wildlife Grants Program in Fiscal Year 2008. What to know who in your state signed the letter? Go to the 
Driving up our driveway the other day we were greeted by a group of 8 turkeys that thought our birdfeeder was more enticing than the carpet of acorns in the area. I swear they were trying to figure out a way to get on one of the birdfeeder’s perches. First time a wild turkey was envious of a chickadee. With the amount of tracks around the house I am convinced their visit was premeditated. The turkeys were obviously making a statement. I think it was a slap, a comment, a critique, a slam, a Bronx cheer. An obscene gesture of contempt: a bird giving the bird. Wait until spring then we’ll see who laughs, I mean gobbles last.
What are the